User:Takinzinnia/2018 Kansas House of Representatives election
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 125 seats in the Kansas House of Representatives 63 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnout | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Kansas |
|---|
 |
The 2018 Kansas House of Representatives elections took place as part of the biennial United States elections. After the 2016 elections, Republicans held a supermajority of eighty-five seats to the Democrats' forty. In the 2018 elections, each party gained five seats from the other, resulting in no net change in the chamber's composition.
| District | Democratic | Republican | Others | Total | Result | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | ||
| District 1 | - | - | 6,103 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,103 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 2 | 4,208 | 49.58% | 4,280 | 50.42% | - | - | 8,488 | 100.00% | R gain from D |
| District 3 | 3,906 | 54.79% | 3,223 | 45.21% | - | - | 7,129 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 4 | 1,963 | 25.02% | 5,883 | 74.98% | - | - | 7,846 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 5 | 2,120 | 27.17% | 5,683 | 72.83% | - | - | 7,803 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 6 | - | - | 7,723 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,723 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 7 | - | - | 5,745 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,745 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 8 | 5,459 | 43.40% | 7,120 | 56.60% | - | - | 12,579 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 9 | - | - | 6,176 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,167 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 10 | 7,695 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 7,695 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 11 | - | - | 5,510 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,510 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 12 | - | - | 6,353 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,353 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 13 | - | - | 6,542 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,542 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 14 | 6,040 | 49.29% | 6,215 | 50.71% | - | - | 12,255 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 15 | 3,704 | 48.46% | 3,940 | 51.54% | - | - | 7,644 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 16 | 6,810 | 58.90% | 4,751 | 41.10% | - | - | 11,561 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 17 | 5,442 | 46.85% | 5,772 | 49.69% | 402 | 3.46% | 11,616 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 18 | 5,831 | 53.49% | 5,070 | 46.51% | - | - | 10,901 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 19 | 5,471 | 41.13% | 7,830 | 58.87% | - | - | 13,301 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 20 | 5,259 | 39.72% | 7,982 | 60.28% | - | - | 13,241 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 21 | 10,503 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 10,503 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 22 | 6,852 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 6,852 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 23 | 4,411 | 52.10% | 4,055 | 47.90% | - | - | 8,466 | 100.00% | D gain from R |
| District 24 | 7,678 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 7,678 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 25 | 6,637 | 50.46% | 6,516 | 49.54% | - | - | 13,193 | 100.00% | D gain from R |
| District 26 | 5,126 | 45.48% | 6,144 | 54.52% | - | - | 11,270 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 27 | 5,476 | 39.41% | 8,420 | 60.59% | - | - | 13,896 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 28 | 5,064 | 44.00% | 6,446 | 56.00% | - | - | 11,510 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 29 | 6,309 | 56.26% | 4,610 | 41.11% | 296 | 2.64% | 11,215 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 30 | 5,534 | 54.33% | 4,651 | 45.67% | - | - | 10,185 | 100.00% | D gain from R |
| District 31 | 4,416 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,416 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 32 | 2,239 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 2,239 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 33 | 4,734 | 69.80% | - | - | 2,048 | 30.20% | 6,782 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 34 | 4,363 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,363 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 35 | 4,722 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,722 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 36 | 7,130 | 69.92% | 3,068 | 30.08% | - | - | 10,198 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 37 | 3,727 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 3,727 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 38 | 4,619 | 42.35% | 6,287 | 57.65% | - | - | 10,906 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 39 | 5,336 | 46.62% | 6,110 | 53.38% | - | - | 11,446 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 40 | 3,585 | 49.52% | 3,655 | 50.48% | - | - | 7,240 | 100.00% | R gain from D |
| District 41 | 3,037 | 57.38% | 2,256 | 42.62% | - | - | 5,293 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 42 | 3,241 | 37.02% | 5,513 | 62.98% | - | - | 8,754 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 43 | 3,266 | 39.97% | 4,906 | 60.03% | - | - | 8,172 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 44 | 9,943 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 9,943 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 45 | 10,049 | 70.17% | 4,272 | 29.83% | - | - | 14,321 | 100.00% | D gain from R |
| District 46 | 9,199 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 9,199 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 47 | 3,360 | 36.77% | 5,777 | 63.23% | - | - | 9,137 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 48 | 5,413 | 50.38% | 5,331 | 49.62% | - | - | 10,744 | 100.00% | D gain from R |
| District 49 | 3,812 | 46.13% | 4,451 | 53.87% | - | - | 8,263 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 50 | 2,484 | 23.18% | 8,232 | 76.82% | - | - | 10,716 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 51 | 3,603 | 35.38% | 6,582 | 64.62% | - | - | 10,185 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 52 | 3,664 | 30.75% | 8,252 | 69.25% | - | - | 11,916 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 53 | 7,416 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 7,416 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 54 | 4,132 | 40.91% | 5,968 | 59.09% | - | - | 10,110 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 55 | 6,415 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 6,415 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 56 | 5,045 | 55.40% | 4,061 | 44.60% | - | - | 9,106 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 57 | 4,672 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,672 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 58 | 4,474 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,474 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 59 | 1,949 | 24.56% | 5,988 | 75.44% | - | - | 7,937 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 60 | - | - | 6,434 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,434 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 61 | - | - | 7,466 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,466 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 62 | 2,627 | 29.65% | 6,232 | 70.35% | - | - | 8,859 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 63 | - | - | 6,503 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,503 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 64 | - | - | 4,364 | 100.00% | - | - | 4,364 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 65 | - | - | 2,717 | 100.00% | - | - | 2,717 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 66 | 5,109 | 77.22% | - | - | 1,507 | 22.78% | 6,616 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 67 | 4,025 | 38.54% | 6,420 | 61.46% | - | - | 10,445 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 68 | - | - | 5,833 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,833 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 69 | 2,741 | 45.39% | 3,298 | 54.61% | - | - | 6,039 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 70 | 2,598 | 32.28% | 5,451 | 67.72% | - | - | 8,049 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 71 | - | - | 7,377 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,377 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 72 | 4,564 | 50.49% | 4,476 | 49.51% | - | - | 9,040 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 73 | - | - | 7,510 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,510 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 74 | - | - | 7,099 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,099 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 75 | - | - | 5,667 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,667 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 76 | - | - | 7,038 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,038 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 77 | - | - | 6,821 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,821 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 78 | 4,517 | 44.53% | 5,627 | 55.47% | - | - | 10,144 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 79 | 3,570 | 49.22% | 3,683 | 50.78% | - | - | 7,253 | 100.00% | R gain from D |
| District 80 | - | - | 5,103 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,103 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 81 | 2,053 | 33.97% | 3,990 | 66.03% | - | - | 6,043 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 82 | 3,223 | 36.78% | 5,540 | 63.03% | - | - | 8,763 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 83 | 3,689 | 61.93% | 2,268 | 38.07% | - | - | 5,957 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 84 | 5,037 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 5,037 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 85 | 4,824 | 46.02% | 5,659 | 53.98% | - | - | 10,483 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 86 | 3,138 | 63.94% | 1,770 | 36.06% | - | - | 4,908 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 87 | - | - | 6,406 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,406 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 88 | 4,596 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 4,596 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 89 | 5,508 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 5,508 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 90 | - | - | 7,686 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,686 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 91 | - | - | 6,347 | 73.11% | 2,334 | 26.89% | 8,681 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 92 | 5,332 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 5,332 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 93 | 2,417 | 29.48% | 5,781 | 70.52% | - | - | 8,198 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 94 | 3,740 | 38.32% | 6,021 | 61.68% | - | - | 9,761 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 95 | 3,535 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 3,535 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 96 | 3,483 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 3,483 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 97 | 2,783 | 42.26% | 3,771 | 57.54% | - | - | 6,554 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 98 | 2,665 | 48.81% | 2,795 | 51.19% | - | - | 5,460 | 100.00% | R gain from D |
| District 99 | 3,592 | 33.17% | 7,238 | 66.83% | - | - | 10,830 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 100 | 4,036 | 39.72% | 6,124 | 60.28% | - | - | 10,160 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 101 | - | - | 8,031 | 100.00% | - | - | 8,031 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 102 | 3,298 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 3,298 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 103 | 2,448 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 2,448 | 100.00% | D hold |
| District 104 | - | - | 5,076 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,076 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 105 | - | - | 5,239 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,239 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 106 | - | - | 7,539 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,539 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 107 | - | - | 6,400 | 76.68% | 1,946 | 23.32% | 8,346 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 108 | - | - | 7,733 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,733 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 109 | - | - | 8,123 | 100.00% | - | - | 8,123 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 110 | 2,042 | 24.18% | 6,403 | 75.82% | - | - | 8,445 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 111 | 4,306 | 49.80% | 4,341 | 50.20% | - | - | 8,647 | 100.00% | R gain from D |
| District 112 | - | - | 5,875 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,875 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 113 | 1,310 | 17.72% | 6,081 | 82.28% | - | - | 7,391 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 114 | 2,269 | 28.99% | 5,558 | 71.01% | - | - | 7,827 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 115 | - | - | 5,192 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,192 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 116 | - | - | 6,465 | 100.00% | - | - | 6,465 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 117 | - | - | 7,173 | 100.00% | - | - | 7,173 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 118 | - | - | 8,170 | 100.00% | - | - | 8,170 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 119 | - | - | 3,762 | 100.00% | - | - | 3,762 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 120 | 1,611 | 18.57% | 7,062 | 81.43% | - | - | 8,673 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 121 | 5,122 | 41.58% | 7,195 | 58.42% | - | - | 12,317 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 122 | - | - | 4,933 | 100.00% | - | - | 4,933 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 123 | 2,038 | 38.07% | 3,315 | 61.93% | - | - | 5,353 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 124 | - | - | 5,154 | 100.00% | - | - | 5,154 | 100.00% | R hold |
| District 125 | - | - | 3,090 | 100.00% | - | - | 3,090 | 100.00% | R hold |
| Total | 385,389 | 40.14% | 566,098 | 58.97% | 8,533 | 0.89% | 960,020 | 100.00% | |